My wife and I spent the last three months getting up to speed on the hit series Mad Men on AMC.
We rented seasons one and two and would watch up to three episodes in one night. It's an addicting show. Donald Draper and his dark twisted lifestyle even haunted me in my dreams. I couldn't get him out of my head.
We eventually got caught up to the third season, which just ended last week. We watched the last three episodes in real-time, when it was actually scheduled to play. Who does that anymore? But we suffered through the commercials because we had to see how season three ended as soon as humanly possible.
Suffice it to say, it ended interestingly.
So, now today as I sit here with nothing but a residual Mad Men buzz, it hits me.
Could the seemingly antiquated method of having a girl (in today's PC world, it would have to be a "person," of course) sit outside your office and take your calls and type up your voice recordings actually be a model for the future? Could 1962 be more relevant today than ever?
Tim Ferriss already does it. In his book 4-hour Workweek he talks about using a virtual assistant for his email and virtual necessities. Does this scale?
As a client manager, what if you could spend more time creating proactive, strategic initiatives for your clients instead of manning email 24/7 putting out one pointless fire after another? Peggy! Take care of that, will you?
As a designer, what if your "girl" read Smashing Magazine for you and synopsized what she thought you'd find interesting?
What if you and your "girl" could each work fewer hours in the week and achieve exponentially more than you do now?
It's a new model of working, sure. But clearly our titans of industry could use a paradigm shift. In this knowledge worker, service-oriented country of ours maybe a new staffing model is just what we need.






